Category | Problem | Solution |
Input Data | Exact chemical content of the emission is uncertain | Perform laboratory analysis of emissions; use analyzers under actual operating conditions |
Lack of data on solubility and reactivity of substances | Refer to engineering handbooks (e.g., Perry’s, DDB, NIST); conduct solubility testing | |
Chemical Reactions | Unaccounted side reactions (formation of salts, foam, precipitates) | Run pilot-scale tests; use defoaming agents if necessary |
Ignoring corrosion processes (affecting material choice and equipment lifespan) | Material selection should account for the pH, thermal conditions, and nature of the process stream—consult a process chemist. | |
Mass Transfer | Incorrect determination of bed height | Use standard HETP calculation methods; apply CFD simulations |
Hydraulics | Errors in pressure drop and flow velocity calculations | Conduct detailed hydraulic calculations considering packing and mist eliminator pressure losses |
Difficulty selecting a pump with the right head and flow rate | Refer to pump performance curves; include losses in piping and spray system | |
Incorrect selection of nozzles or sprays | Use nozzles with known spray characteristics; verify spray coverage area | |
Water Circuit | Excess or insufficient water | Add level sensors and dosing meters; automate fresh water and blowdown control |
Errors in recirculation, pH control, or blowdown calculations | Integrate pH sensors and fluid regulation devices; use SCADA/PLC for automation | |
Practical Experience | Some parameters are difficult to determine without field experience | Involve engineers with practical expertise; use data from similar projects to guide development |
Modeling requires high-level expertise | Delegate modeling to specialized engineering teams; use reliable software (e.g., Aspen Plus, Ansys) |